A detectorist and Archaeologist working side by side at Montpelier
Finding an acceptable approach to recording provenance is very difficult in a Rally environment, but I do have ideas – ideas that will become more and more realistic as some basic technology enters the market. Rallies are about the fast-paced thrill of hearing, digging, holding and sharing. I’ve spent years thinking about how to bridge the gap between the rigor of Archaeology and the fun of metal detecting. We’ve Brainstormed ideas for using technology tools and added training on rapidly gathering provenance that are “better than nothing.”
As a certified geek, I have high hopes that new field devices such as 2cm smartphone GPS and simple, form-based site forms will facilitate better amateur data collection without as much perceived overhead. I am constantly testing new ideas like this, but even at my “most efficient,” I still spend 30-50% of my time in the field gathering data while my metal detector sits patiently idle. Tools aside, this takes a real commitment from the detectorists to enjoy their hobby differently – to find their thrill in contributing to a bigger dataset beyond what’s in their finds bag.
One impulsive thought would be to pair each metal detectorist with someone in charge of recording provenance, sort of like our metal detecting sessions at Montpelier. I’m afraid this would be considered intolerable at a rally. Participants have paid fees, scraped together precious vacation days and driven miles for this much anticipated weekend. But asking them to spend 30-50% of their detecting time filling in forms or waiting for a dig-mate to do in-situ analysis is not what they had in mind. Plus, I doubt any archaeologists would risk their reputation on such an endeavor – who would sign their name to that dataset? (Pace matters at DIV since an impressive display of artifacts is a great source of personal pride at the end-of-event exhibits. )
Some of my data gathering (solo hunting) HandyGPS + Geotagged Images + ImageSetter results from Civil War Camp. I spend over 1/3 of my time documenting everything. A possible solution for Rallies?
I do have an idea that could work at Rallies – something like the HandyGPS smartphone app allows simple geo-tagged images within the app with +/- 1-2 meter resolution. In future phones that will be sub-meter. It places them in a special phone folder that can easily be grabbed later. If each participant stopped by a “phone station” where a USB cable was connected and a copy of the images was grabbed after the hunts, they could be merged using into a Google-Earth and GIS using GeoSetter – ready KML file very easily. That resulting file could be made each year and provided as research data. UPDATE: I recently updated to an external GPS receiver and my resolution is now +/-6ft regularly.
Detectorists and Archaeologists
Ask detectorists to avoid such massive artifact removal events so that future archaeologists can properly excavate someday-maybe, and detectorists (correctly) refer to warehouses of boxed artifacts collecting dust in curation backlogs – never to be properly appreciated or accessed for any reason (until they’re eventually victim of a budget cut or accident.) The question is …why not “save” the artifacts now by people who will appreciate them before they “rot in the ground?” When would the finds they are recovering in the excavation in the future be available to the public in a professional-only scenario? While I see a lot of cooperation happening on smaller, Archaeologist-lead projects – cooperation on rallies is likely impossible without some changes.